<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NCEA level 2 Chemistry: Structure and bonding Oscars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnwest.edublogs.org/2009/07/01/ncea-level-2-chemistry-structure-and-bonding-oscars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnwest.edublogs.org/2009/07/01/ncea-level-2-chemistry-structure-and-bonding-oscars/</link>
	<description>assisting learning inside school from the outside.....JOHN WEST HOD SCIENCE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 08:27:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: johnwest</title>
		<link>http://johnwest.edublogs.org/2009/07/01/ncea-level-2-chemistry-structure-and-bonding-oscars/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>johnwest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwest.edublogs.org/?p=184#comment-85</guid>
		<description>Hi Bryce,

Thanks for logging on and leaving a comment. Some feedback on you group&#039;s highly commendable effort.

Your video had a very high entertainment value. I liked the weird humour around The Dudes and the whole performance was well paced with touches of creativity.

I appreciated the section where you presented theoretical material on the board and interacted confidently with the class. It showed a sound grasp of the chemical concepts underlying the presentation. This will stand you in good stead when you practice written responses to questions from NCEA papers.

I liked the group&#039;s confidence in &quot;taking chances&quot; and willingness to &quot;give it a go&quot; There will be other opportunities to mix artistic talent with chemistry knowledge and I hope to see the same level of commitment again.

It was a genuinely tough choice between the two groups</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bryce,</p>
<p>Thanks for logging on and leaving a comment. Some feedback on you group&#8217;s highly commendable effort.</p>
<p>Your video had a very high entertainment value. I liked the weird humour around The Dudes and the whole performance was well paced with touches of creativity.</p>
<p>I appreciated the section where you presented theoretical material on the board and interacted confidently with the class. It showed a sound grasp of the chemical concepts underlying the presentation. This will stand you in good stead when you practice written responses to questions from NCEA papers.</p>
<p>I liked the group&#8217;s confidence in &#8220;taking chances&#8221; and willingness to &#8220;give it a go&#8221; There will be other opportunities to mix artistic talent with chemistry knowledge and I hope to see the same level of commitment again.</p>
<p>It was a genuinely tough choice between the two groups</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryce</title>
		<link>http://johnwest.edublogs.org/2009/07/01/ncea-level-2-chemistry-structure-and-bonding-oscars/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 03:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwest.edublogs.org/?p=184#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Oops, Na+ ions don&#039;t got to the negative electrode... my bad!
Other than that i think the use of song and paper hats gave group one &#039;qualities&#039; that no one else had...

As for the other groups who were more scientifically correct... The explanations were well done, espescially the &#039;oscar&#039; winning group. It&#039;d be an improvemet though if they weren&#039;t reading off scripts, and incorporated some humour. 
Paper hats for the win! XD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, Na+ ions don&#8217;t got to the negative electrode&#8230; my bad!<br />
Other than that i think the use of song and paper hats gave group one &#8216;qualities&#8217; that no one else had&#8230;</p>
<p>As for the other groups who were more scientifically correct&#8230; The explanations were well done, espescially the &#8216;oscar&#8217; winning group. It&#8217;d be an improvemet though if they weren&#8217;t reading off scripts, and incorporated some humour.<br />
Paper hats for the win! XD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
